skip to Main Content
CBD-Based Products: What Marketers Should Know in Today’s Uncertain Regulatory Landscape

By Richard Fama and Kristin Keehan

The passage of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, commonly known as the “Farm Bill”, removed hemp and all of its cannabinoids, including CBD, from the Controlled Substances Act.[1]However, excitement over the passage of this legislation was quickly tempered by the Food and Drug Administration’s statement that, under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), it remains unlawful to introduce hemp-derived CBD into food and beverages and to market CBD-based products as dietary supplements.[2]CBD is an active ingredient in FDA-approved drugs, and under the FDCA it is illegal to introduce drug ingredients into the food supply or to market them as dietary supplements absent prior approval.[3]

At a recent hearing in May of this year, FDA reiterated  its position and focused on the multitude of unanswered questions and lack of research surrounding CBD and its proposed uses.[4]Fortunately, FDA has assembled an internal working group to address these unanswered questions and propose potential pathways for marketing and selling CBD products[5], though such pathways do not appear to be forthcoming in the near future.

Notwithstanding FDA’s current position on CBD, companies large and small have already brought to  market a myriad of products, ranging from CBD-infused gummies to CBD capsules to CBD-containing pet treats.  After all, CBD is big business and consumers are always searching for alternative remedies. In fact, it is anticipated that the CBD industry will grow to $16 billion by 2025.[6]However, given the current regulatory landscape, those companies are at risk of enforcement actions by FDA and violations by state and local governments. And like marketers of all other products, the risk of product liability and consumer fraud lawsuits is ever-present. In order to mitigate against these risks, there are a few best practices that marketers of CBD-based products should consider.

 Avoid Health Claims

At FDA’s recent public hearing regarding CBD, acting Commissioner Dr. Sharpless emphasized that FDA’s “biggest concern” is “the marketing of products that put the health and safety of consumers at risk, such as those claiming to prevent, diagnose, mitigate, treat or cure diseases, such as cancer, in the absence of requisite approvals.”[7]It is FDA’s belief that such unapproved health claims may encourage patients and consumers to use CBD-containing products to treat serious and potentially fatal diseases at the expense of more traditional and approved therapies.[8]It is therefore not surprising that FDA has been particularly aggressive in policing against unapproved health claims. 

For example, FDA recently sent warning letters to companies marketing dietary supplements containing CBD. In these letters, FDA admonished these companies for attributing health benefits to their CBD-containing products and claiming that they are effective for treating certain medical conditions, including combating tumors and cancer cells. These companies were advised to promptly take action to address these violations or FDA would consider taking further action without notice, including seizure of the offending products and/or the imposition of injunctions.

In order to steer clear of FDA enforcement proceedings and state and local regulatory actions, marketers of CBD products should consider avoiding health claims (i.e., that their products are capable of preventing, diagnosing, mitigating, treating or curing diseases). In addition to helping keep FDA at bay, avoiding the use of health claims will also mitigate against the risk of consumer fraud lawsuits challenging the scientific or factual veracity of representations made by marketers.

Always Have Claim Substantiation on Hand

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces federal consumer protection laws that prevent fraud, deception and unfair business practices. For products making health, safety or efficacy claims, the FTC requires that advertisers possess “competent and reliable scientific evidence,” defined as “tests, analyses, research, or studies that have been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by qualified persons and [that] are generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results.”[9]

Prior to making anyclaims in the marketing and advertising of CBD-based products, including claims related to the products’ ingredients, potency, purity and efficacy, marketers need to have evidence on hand supporting these claims.  Such evidence will not only be useful if marketing claims are challenged by FTC but will also serve to mitigate against the potential for consumer fraud litigation. In short, all representations on the products’ packaging and advertising must be truthful and factually and scientifically verifiable.

Provide the Proper Product Warnings and Instructions

Apart from FDA regulatory concerns, marketers should keep in mind basic product liability principles. Specifically, marketers of CBD-containing products should consider warning consumers about the potential risks associated with use of their products and providing instructions on how to use them safely. 

Examples of such warnings and instructions may include, but are not limited to, advising consumers: (1) to consult with a medical professional prior to use; (2) to discuss with a medical professional the medications (both prescription and non-prescription) that the consumer is presently or plans to be taking while using the CBD-based product; (3) to keep the products out of reach of children; (4) about proper storage of the product, e.g., in refrigerated environment; (5) and about any known potential side effects. Generally, warnings should be presented clearly on the packaging of these products so that they can be readily seen and understood by the average consumer.

Be Aware of State-Specific Regulatory Concerns

Knowledge of the laws of the specific states marketers wish to sell their products is also  critically important. What may be legal under one state’s laws may be illegal under another. For example, Texas recently passed legislation that legalizes the production and sale of certain hemp products, including containing CBD.[10]However, in Colorado, while CBD is a permissible food ingredient under that state’s laws [11], it remains unlawful to add CBD to pet food.[12]It is therefore recommended that marketers consult competent legal counsel to advise them on the specific state laws that may be applicable to their particular products.

Contracts with Suppliers

Marketers of CBD-containing products will undoubtedly rely upon third parties for a variety of essential functions, ranging from the provision of ingredients, including hemp and CBD, to the co-manufacture and distribution of their finished products. Marketers should ensure that these third-parties adhere to pre-established and agreed upon standards and specifications and provide warranties regarding the safety and efficacy of their products and services. Also, where possible, marketers should consider including provisions in their agreements with these third-parties that would require them to provide indemnification in the event of actual or claimed losses. Marketers should also insist that their third-party suppliers and service providers maintain sufficient levels of insurance coverage and that they be added as additional insureds on their insurance policies.

Conclusion

Marketers of CBD products face near limitless opportunities and a wealth of challenges. While consumer demand remains extraordinarily high, FDA has not yet provided legal pathways for the sale of CBD-containing products, and states’ laws governing CBD are constantly evolving. Lurking in the background are consumer protection and product liability lawyers waiting to jump on marketers’ missteps.  To be sure, these challenges make it impossible to eliminate all risks confronting companies marketing CBD-containing products. Consideration of the foregoing suggestions, however, may serve to mitigate against those risks and aid marketers in fulfilling all of the opportunities available to them.  

[1]Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, H.R.2, 115th Congress, § 1 (2018)

[2]Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D.,on signing of the Agriculture Improvement Act and the agency’s regulation of products containing cannabis and cannabis-derived compounds, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, available at: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm628988.htm.

[3]Id.; FDA and Marijuana Questions and Answers, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, available at: https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/publichealthfocus/ucm421168.htm#active_ingredient.

[4]Remarks by Dr. Sharpless at the FDA Public Hearing on Scientific Data and Information about Products Containing Cannabis or Cannabis-Derived Compounds,U.S. Food & Drug Administration (May 31, 2019), available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/speeches-fda-officials/remarks-dr-sharpless-fda-public-hearing-scientific-data-and-information-about-products-containing.

[5]Id.

[6]CBD Market Could Reach $16 Billion by 2025, New Analysis Finds, Fortune, by: Kristine Owram and Bloomberg, available at: http://fortune.com/2019/02/25/cbd-cannabinoids-market/(Feb. 25, 2019).

[7]Supranote 3.

[8]Id.

[9]See, e.g.,POM Wonderful LLC, 155 F.T.C. 56, 193 (2013), aff’d in part, 777 F.3d 478, 504- 05 (D.C. Cir. 2015), cert. denied, No. 15-525, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2991 (May 2, 2016); Telebrands Corp., 140 F.T.C. 278, 347 (2005), aff’d, 457 F.3d 354 (4th Cir. 2006); Novartis Corp., 127 F.T.C. 580, 725 (1999), aff’d, 223 F.3d 783 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Brake Guard Prods., Inc., 125 F.T.C. 138, 256 (1998).

[10]TX HB 1325.

[11]Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_MfgFd_IndustrialHempPolicy_FY18.pdf

[12]FAQs on Industrial Hemp as Commercial Feed, CO Dep’t of Agriculture,https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/aginspection/faqs-industrial-hemp-commercial-feed

Rich Fama

Rich Fama

Rich Fama focuses his practice on class action and complex litigation in the areas of toxic tort, products liability, food and liquor liability, construction defect, and mass tort actions, and has decades of experience litigating in New York’s state and federal courts.

Fama possesses a particular knowledge of handling cases involving catastrophic injuries and damages. He defended life sciences corporations in the PPA and pedicle screw litigations. He is currently lead defense counsel on several well-publicized and high-exposure cases involving the release of toxic substances into the environment, including mold, lead, asbestos, methanol, benzene, and other chemicals and contaminates. He also represents product manufacturers in class action matters involving alleged product defects and mislabeling, including alleged Federal Trade Commission violations regarding “Made in the U.S.A.” claims.  Richard also serves as consulting counsel to various entities for claims arising out of alleged exposure to diacetyl at microwave popcorn manufacturing facilities.

Richard has a construction background, having worked in several large architectural and engineering consulting firms prior to attending law school. That background, combined with his pursuit of coursework in both architecture and engineering, has proven invaluable to his handling of construction defect and related matters.

Fama earned his law degree from Hofstra University School of Law in 1993 and his undergraduate degree from New York Institute of Technology in 1987.

Kristin Keehan concentrates her practice on class action and complex litigation and regulatory compliance.

The focus of her litigation practice is in the areas of construction and labor law, toxic tort, products liability, and food liability. She has experience handling all phases of litigation, from initiation of suit to jury selection.

Kristin has significant experience providing regulatory advice and conducting regulatory reviews for major food, beverage and over-the-counter drug companies. Kristin also assists with regulatory compliance reviews for marketers of medical marijuana and CBD products.

She has successfully defended clients in construction and labor law litigation and defeated claims based on alleged violations of Labor Law § 240(1). Kristin works with clients of major construction companies to address safety concerns and best practices for accident prevention and response.

Kristin graduated magna cum laude from Albany Law School, where she was a senior editor with the Albany Government Law Review and an associate editor for the Center for Judicial Process.

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Stories

CDTFA Cannabis Creditor: Myths and Truths

By Hilary Bricken, Attorney at Husch Blackwell Dealing with creditors is never a fun experience. However, some creditors are more severe than others, especially in the cannabis industry. One of…

If FL Supreme Court approves cannabis ballot language, will voters go for recreational weed or not?

The long wait on whether Floridians will get a chance to vote to legalize recreational cannabis for adults 21 and older is almost over, as the Florida Supreme Court is…

Missouri strips marijuana licenses connected to company accused of predatory behavior

Missouri’s health department on Wednesday stripped two coveted marijuana micro-licenses tied to an out-of-state company that had been accused of predatory practices and had listed the licenses for resale. The…

Dug In: Big Island Grown’s Deep Cannabis Roots

Big Island Grown (BIG) is a vertically integrated cannabis company based in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii County, on the Big Island of Hawaii, whose reach now extends to several islands in the…

More Categories

Back To Top
×Close search
Search