This article seems to clearly suggest that CBD from hemp (i.e. cannabis less than 0.3% dry weight delta-9-THC) should be classified and regulated in an entirely different manner than CBD from cannabis, while at the same time acknowledging that hemp is a form of cannabis. So if CBD can come from any variety of cannabis, how does one distinguish between 99.9999% pure CBD and 99.9999% pure CBD? This seems to complicate the debate. Instead, wouldn’t market relevant standards for low-THC resin cultivars of cannabis separate from those for high-THC resin cultivars of cannabis make more sense? Reply