skip to Main Content
Jeff Sessions Waives Sword of Damocles
By Steve Schain
With Jeff Sessions threatening to singlehandedly crush $7.2 billion legalized marijuana industry spanning 30 states, generating millions in taxes and providing 10 of thousands of jobs, much confusion abounds.
While unclear if merely a “knee jerk reaction” to California program’s launch breadth of coverage, unless and until the United States Department of Justice (“Justice Department”) provides an official statement, publication, or other specific information, neither legalized marijuana’s current status – nor the Federal Government lack of Congressional mandate or funds to derail state programs – has changed.
Background
The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 prohibits marijuana’s manufacture, distribution, dispensation and possession and lists it next to heroin as a Schedule I controlled substance having “a high potential for abuse” for which there’s “no currently accepted medical use in treatment”.  21 U.S.C. §§ 801, Et. Seq (1970).  Those manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing marijuana, or touching it at some point along the supply chain (ex., planting, cultivating, harvesting, processing/extracting, testing, packaging, disposing, transporting, and dispensing), are deemed “Plant-Touching” Marijuana Related Businesses (“MRBs”).  Id.; “FIN-2014-G001: BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses,” FinCEN, February 14, 2014.
Presently, 30 States, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealths of Guam and Puerto Rico have legalized marijuana programs protected from federal interference by the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment which, in turn, incorporates the Justice Department’s “Cole Memorandum” Policy.
Originally passed as an attachment to the Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill for fiscal year 2014, repeatedly renewed, and commonly known as the known as Rohrabacher- Blumenauer Amendment, the law prohibits the Justice Department from using federal funds to prevent certain states “from implementing their own State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession or cultivation of medical marijuana.”
The Rohrabacher- Blumenauer Amendment incorporates the findings of Justice Department “policy clarifying” memoranda restraining U.S. Attorneys’ CSA enforcement in legalized marijuana states (hereinafter, collectively referred to as “Cole Memorandum”).  While reiterating marijuana’s CSA illegality, the Cole Memorandum instructs focusing federal resources on “most significant threats in the most effective, consistent, and rational way” listing “8 enforcement priorities” of preventing: distribution of marijuana to minors; marijuana sale revenue going to criminal enterprises, gangs, and cartels; diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states; state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity; violence and use of firearms in marijuana’s cultivation and distribution; drugged driving and exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use; growing of marijuana on public lands and attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands; and marijuana possession or use on federal property.
Impact if Cole Memorandum is Rescinded
If the Justice Department rescinds the Cole Memorandum, nothing will change.
The $7.2 billion legalized marijuana industry spanning 30 states, generating millions in taxes and providing 10 of thousands of jobs will continue and the Federal Government will lack both the Congressional mandate and funding to use Federal resources to derail state programs
If the Cole Memorandum is rescinded, Congress may be forced to strengthen the spending restrictions governing the Justice Department surrounding cannabis when its enacts its new budget.  While not necessarily changing the status quo necessarily, it may increase the ambiguity as to what comprises full compliance with state laws.
Steven SchainSteven Schain

Steven Schain

2019 National Law Journal “Finance, Banking, & Capital Markets Trailblazer” award winner, Steve Schain is Senior Counsel at Smart-Counsel, LLC, a 100% female owned boutique Cannabis law firm.  Steve  represents entities, governments and individuals in litigation, regulation and compliance, financial services, license applications and entity formation. Reach Steve at [email protected]

This Post Has One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Stories

French Senators Petition Macron’s Government For Urgent Cannabis Reform

OVER 30 senators from the Socialist, Ecologist and Republican group have called for the launch of a consultation process to introduce new laws to legalize cannabis in France. The co-signed letter from 31 senators, published in the Le Monde newspaper explores several options for the legalization of cannabis – and rejects the notion of decriminalization, saying…

New Jersey Marijuana Prices Expected To Drop As Market Expands

In its first 70 days of being a legal market in New Jersey, recreational marijuana collected close to $80 million in total sales, according to the latest figures. Folks involved with ramping up the industry expect that number to grow as time goes on, and for consumers to experience more options and more affordable prices…

Cilicon Partners with Vape-Jet to Offer an Intelligent & Integrated Vaporizer Solution

PRESS RELEASE Cilicon, a global provider of cannabis vape hardware, and Vape-Jet a U.S. -based infrastructure platform for cannabis oil-filling, announced today that they have formed an official partnership to provide an intelligent one-stop product solution for cannabis brands around the world. Based on a mutual understanding of the value of technology orientation for business growth…

NY’s medical marijuana patients frustrated as home-grow rules remain elusive

As the gears of the state’s rule-making process grind slowly forward, frustration and impatience best describe the feelings of New Yorkers who rely on cannabis as medicine. While the Office of Cannabis Management continues to assess the latest round of public comments on proposed rules governing personal cultivation by medical patients, a trio of such patients recently offered their experiences…

More Categories

Back To Top
×Close search
Search