skip to Main Content
FinCEN: Steady Upward Trend of More Commercial Banks Working With Cannabis Businesses

The cannabis banking conundrum is getting better.. but still has a long way to go.

That is the finding of recently released information by the Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) that charted cannabis banking activity from January, 2014 to March, 2017.

The FinCEN report showed that depository institutions that provided banking services to marijuana-related businesses (MRBs) – banks and credit unions – both showed significant increases, especially since September, 2014.

The total number of combined institutions actively banking cannabis businesses as of March was reported at 368.

But there was a clear difference. The disparity between the two institutions became clearer as time went on.

Credit unions basically stayed at a level of approximately 60 institutions year-over-year serving the cannabis industry, while banks serving the industry soared to over 300 by March, 2017 – doubling their growth from the same month in 2015.

The FinCEN report also found that, as of March 2017, the enforcement network received a total of 28,651 suspicious activity reports (SARs) about possible money-laundering activity with MRBs.

FinCEN’s regulations allow federal, state, local, and foreign (European Union) law enforcement agencies, through FinCEN, to reach out to more than 39,000 points of contact at more than 16,000 financial institutions to locate accounts and transactions of persons that may be involved in suspicious activity related to either terrorism or money laundering.

Of those reported SARs to FinCEN, 20,288 came from 45 states, D.C., and Puerto Rico and showed that those businesses had done their due diligence and were compliant with the Cole memo.

Another 2,007 reports from 40 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico indicated those institutions were not completely compliant and were under ongoing investigation.

Finally, 7,326 SARS were filed in 50 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico that resulted in those institutions ending any banking relationship with an MRB.

While all this sounds promising as the number of banks serving MRBs are trending up, the total institutions banking MRBs is still just a small percentage of all U.S. banks and credit unions. There are 5,922 credit unions in the U.S. as of May, 2017, according to the Credit Union National Association, while the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) lists 6,799 commercial banks.

The bottom line remains that, as long as financial institutions are in compliance with the eight priorities listed in the Cole memo – not distributing cannabis to minors, not diverting cannabis from a legal state to a non-legal state, not growing on public lands, among others – banking for the cannabis businesses will work out.

But according to the Cole memo, if a financial institution or individual provides banking services to a marijuana-related business knowing that the business is diverting marijuana from a state where marijuana sales are regulated to ones where such sales are illegal under state law, or is being used by a criminal organization to conduct financial transactions for its criminal goals, such as the concealment of funds derived from other illegal activity or the use of marijuana proceeds to support other illegal activity, that institution will face charges.

The memo also reminds institutions that they have the burden of due diligence when it comes to compliance, stating that “if the financial institution or individual is willfully blind to such activity by, for example, failing to conduct appropriate due diligence of the customers’ activities, such prosecution might be appropriate.”

The FDIC is doing its part to encourage institutions to take a risk-based approach in assessing individual customer relationships rather than declining to provide banking services to entire categories of customers, like those represented by MRBs. “The FDIC is aware that some institutions may be hesitant to provide certain types of banking services due to concerns that they will be unable to comply with the associated requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA),” a statement on banking released by the FDIC reads. “The FDIC and the other federal banking agencies recognize that as a practical matter, it is not possible for a financial institution to detect and report all potentially illicit transactions that flow through an institution. When an institution follows existing guidance and establishes and maintains an appropriate risk-based program, the institution will be well-positioned to appropriately manage customer accounts, while generally detecting and deterring illicit financial transactions.”

While the current industry thinking is that just smaller institutions are getting involved with the cannabis industry, there is evidence that that is not the case. A recent report in American Banker magazine after analysis of applications revealed that Bank of America, Citi, and JP Morgan banks or their subsidiaries were working with medical dispensaries in Massachusetts.

David HodesDavid Hodes

David Hodes

David Hodes is based in the greater Washington DC metropolitan area. He is the former editor of seven different business magazines, and has contributed feature articles to several business/lifestyle publications and national cannabis magazines. Hodes is also a former field producer for CBS News, NBC, NFL Network, ESPN and other media outlets; worked as a news promotions producer for two network affiliates; and was the morning news editor for a third network affiliate.

He is member of the National Press Club, and deputy booking agent for the National Press Club Headliners Committee.

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Stories

Lawmaker’s sick day causes recreational marijuana bill to fail by 1 vote in Delaware House

The pursuit to create a recreational marijuana industry in Delaware hit a bump on Thursday, as a bill seeking to regulate the growing and selling of weed failed in the House by one vote. Rep. Larry Mitchell, House majority whip, was ill and could not vote, said House spokesman Drew Volturo. Mitchell is a co-sponsor of…

Op-Ed: Why legal weed is losing the war to illegal weed

The market for legal weed is growing. But in California, as elsewhere, it faces serious challenges. We’re not talking about droughts, climate change or supply chain shortages. The biggest challenge is competition from illegal weed. Our best estimate is that roughly three-quarters of the weed currently sold to consumers in California is illegal (meaning it…

Marijuana labeling system “not an effective or safe way” to detail what’s inside the products, CU study finds

Researchers analyzed labels on 90,000 cannabis products and found them unreliable in describing chemical compounds consumers inhale Marijuana product labels fail to capture “the chemical reality” of what people smoke, a University of Colorado study has concluded after analyzing 90,000 samples offered for sale in six states. The widely used labeling system purported to predict…

Congress might have inadvertently legalized a form of cannabis under Trump

Although marijuana remains strictly forbidden by federal law, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Congress quietly amended the statute in 2018 to legalize cannabis cigarettes and vaping products that have similar intoxicants but are made from hemp. The 2018 Farm Bill, signed by President Donald Trump, included provisions removing most legal restrictions on hemp,…

More Categories

Back To Top
×Close search