skip to Main Content
Using Clip Art Discredits Your Brand

If it looks like clip art, it most likely is.

I received a newsletter from a media source that I had never seen before. The moment that I saw the branding, I suspected that the logo contained clip art. In order to satisfy my curiosity, I went online to do some research. I found that my hunch was correct. Branding of seventy-five (75) companies that were found online are currently using that same icon in their logos! Professionals from doctors and landscapers to consultants and beverage companies are all using this popular piece of clip-art also known as stock-art.

So what is the problem with this? First of all, it appears that you do not value your brand. If you are not going to invest in yourself by creating a professional brand image, then why should the consumer invest in your brand with their purchase? Quality branding is very important, especially in this highly competitive age we are in. You are a pioneer in this industry. If you plan to be a leader who will build and maintain a strong brand, it is best to have that reflected in your brand identity.

Secondly, when using clip-art, the image is not truly “your” logo. You cannot trademark art that you do not own. Even if you purchased a download from a stock image website, it does not give you ownership of that image. It also makes your product/service questionable. If your brand identity does not reflect professionalism and quality, then why would your customer believe that you are using quality ingredients? Or believe that you are hiring knowledgeable staff members?

The image is so important people. Truly, even the most gorgeous piece of clip art can directly harm your brand image. The famous lotus flower clip-art, currently in use by numerous cannabis companies is a perfect example of what not to do.

Ask your designer. I believe that many people have been innocent victims of poor designers. They are unaware that their brand identity contains art that they cannot trademark. They don’t know that it is in use by other brands. I have clients who have had this experience. In these “digital days” of everyone trying to do it themselves, there are many realizing that it is not a wise choice. Many hire inexperienced designers on bargain brand websites and find out the hard way that you get what you pay for. Feel free to ask your designer where the image came from and if it is original art.

When preparing to create your valued brand identity, remember to consider what a huge part of our business it is, and make a wise choice to be original.

Wendy RallWendy Rall

Wendy Rall

Wendy Rall is a professional graphic designer with over 30 years experience. After graduating from The Art Institute of Philadelphia, she worked with east coast design firms for 20 years. In 2002, she moved to Mexico and cofounded Planeta Surf magazine. Now based in California Wendy owns and operates Budd Branding, a boutique design studio. www.buddbranding.com

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Stories

Marijuana labeling system “not an effective or safe way” to detail what’s inside the products, CU study finds

Researchers analyzed labels on 90,000 cannabis products and found them unreliable in describing chemical compounds consumers inhale Marijuana product labels fail to capture “the chemical reality” of what people smoke, a University of Colorado study has concluded after analyzing 90,000 samples offered for sale in six states. The widely used labeling system purported to predict…

Congress might have inadvertently legalized a form of cannabis under Trump

Although marijuana remains strictly forbidden by federal law, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Congress quietly amended the statute in 2018 to legalize cannabis cigarettes and vaping products that have similar intoxicants but are made from hemp. The 2018 Farm Bill, signed by President Donald Trump, included provisions removing most legal restrictions on hemp,…

Marijuana regulation bill fails in Delaware House

A bill establishing a structure for regulating the production and sale of marijuana failed in the State House Thursday. State Rep. Edward Osienski’s (D-Newark) bill would have imposed a 15% tax on marijuana sales and created a limited number of licenses for sale, cultivation and testing. Osienski underscored he also sought to address the disproportionate…

Oklahoma House votes to raise costs of commercial medical marijuana licenses

The Oklahoma House of Representatives moved closer to its goal of comprehensive medical marijuana reform on Thursday with the passage of six additional bills, including a substantial hike in the cost of most commercial licenses. House Bill 2179, by Rep. Scott Fetgatter, R-Okmulgee, would create a tiered commercial grower fee structure based on size and…

More Categories

Back To Top
×Close search
Search