skip to Main Content
How to Choose the Best Cannabis Extraction Method: BHO

By Rick Scarpello, CEO of Medically Correct

Let’s discuss cannabis extraction methods with facts and not religion. I’m pro-faith, but let’s call it what it is. When someone has faith in their opinion and not scientific evidence, it’s a religious endeavor. I will try to stay with what we know and let religious zealots scream from the rooftop about co2 being better.

  • Hydrocarbon extractions are the most widely used method in the world for consumables.
  • CO2 extracts are hardly used for consumption products, estimated at 2 percent (2%).
  • Hydrocarbons have been used in the food chain for 50 plus years.
  • Hydrocarbon extractions are being done every day, in almost every state for food and ingredients.
  • Everyone is consuming hydrocarbons everyday while they eat from things flavor extracted oils like sunflower and canola.
  • You breathe in butane through the air, even if you don’t like it. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), “The average daily intake of n-butane via air is 183mg.”

Extraction methods use a solvent to run through the plant material and squeeze out the much desired oil, or errl as industry folks call it. The solvents range from; water, co2, ethanol (alcohol), and hydrocarbons. Solvents aren’t inherently bad, thanks to science, remember?

Yes, I gave away the ending with the title of this article, but it is still a fun read for pro- and anti-butane people. It will make some of you applaud, and others curse. You will win either way because we are talking about cannabis being more legitimate than the previous 100 years—and we are all pro-cannabis.

Comparing Extractions Methods

Let’s talk about each extraction method and try to conclude which is best. Since it is imperative to the conversation, I will define ‘best’ for this exercise.

To be the best you have to do few a things for me. As a for-profit business operator, you want to ensure your extract is as pure as possible without much post-process, as that costs more money. When making medicine for children and the elderly, as is the case for my business, I need more good quality constituents and clean results. I want less waxes and fatty acids, and more flavonoids, terpenoids, cannabinoids, and trichome heads.

Cannabis Extraction with Water

The basic principle is that plant material (either dry or fresh-frozen generally) is mixed with cold water and ice, then agitated manually or mechanically in order to break off the now-brittle trichome heads. Then, the solution is filtered through specifically-sized screens.

Using water at home is by far one of the easiest methods; however, this method results in a less pure medicine and leaves more plant matter behind. It can also mold if dried improperly. It is an issue when molds and microbes remain on the plant matter after the process.

Toxicity Summary: Accidentally consuming too much water under normal circumstances is exceptionally rare. Nearly all deaths related to water intoxication in normal individuals have resulted either from water-drinking contests, in which individuals attempt to consume large amounts of water, or from long bouts of exercise during which excessive amounts of fluid were consumed.

Cannabis Extraction with Ethanol (alcohol)

Ethanol is heavily used in the food industry for extractions. Most flavors or edible extractions use alcohol. A lot of machine companies lean this way, and you can find dozens in a quick Google search or on Linkedin. Alcohol is very clean, easy to remove, and easy to retain after the extraction. This is a simple way to extract and should be a commonly used extraction method for home use. This method has the potential to over extract polar and non-polar undesirables. It is very flammable and combustible but less volatile than Butane.

Toxicity Summary: Ethanol is a 2-carbon–chain alcohol; the chemical formula is CH2 CH3 OH. It is ubiquitous throughout the world and is a leading cause of morbidity across cultures. Ethanol is the most common psychoactive drug used by children and adolescents in the United States and is one of the most commonly abused drugs in the world, according to Medscape.

Cannabis Extraction with CO2

CO2, also known as carbon dioxide, is odorless and colorless. Since leaks are undetected and can lead to asphyxiation fatalities, it has been recognized as a workplace hazard for a century. Highly compressed bottles are rarely used in extractions as a whole. CO2 is less pure of an extraction since it can be over-extracted and create more lipids and wax. The H2O content in the extract after processing is a concern as well. For the first time in history, patients are potentially smoking water into their lungs that could result in pneumonia.

The food industry hardly makes big machinery for this purpose. The Cannabis industry has embraced this method and it’s winning big time. The number 1 method to extract cannabis (according to the Cannabist) is CO2. This process has a lot of money behind it and all of the big players touting its ways. Many new companies are making small scale machinery for Cannabis.

Toxicity Summary: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a toxic gas at high concentration, as well as an asphyxiant gas (due to reduction in oxygen). Irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat only occur at high concentrations. Gas masks may have limited use in high CO2 concentrations due to the lack of oxygen. Thus, it has been recommended that working or living areas should be immediately evacuated when concentrations exceed 1.5% by volume (the occupational short-term exposure limit value). Ambient guidelines for CO2 do not exist.

Cannabis Extraction with n-butane (hydrocarbons)

The #1 extraction method in the world is hydrocarbon extraction for food and ingredients. Many companies are making large equipment—some are the size of a truck and some are two stories tall—but in a variety of versions. Since the 1970s, several different hydrocarbons have been used. From propane to hexane, we consume them in restaurants and at home everyday. It is volatile and flammable. There are some concerns about residual solvent if not properly purged.

Many small new companies are making machinery for butane or propane extractions in cannabis. It can be done 100% safely with proper personnel and proper SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures). There are now engineer’s and industrial hygienists involved in peer reviews for this equipment. You can find Class 1, Division 1 extraction environments so there is nothing safer to use.

Toxicity Summary: n-Butane is a colorless, flammable gas at room temperature. It occurs as a component in natural gas from which it is refined. n-Butane is used as fuel, refrigerant and aerosol propellant. The acute toxicity of n-butane has been studied after inhalation exposure in experimental animals. LC50 (4h) was 658 mg/l in rats and LC50 (2h) was 680 mg/l in mice. In dogs, lethal concentrations ranged from 474 to 592 mg/l. A concentration of 308 mg/l caused light anesthesia in mice within 25 minutes, and an exposure to 521 mg/l had similar effect within one minute.

Conclusion:

There is no evidence that butane is more dangerous to use than co2, water, or ethanol. In fact, the evidence may actually be the contrary. CO2 companies are at the forefront of the complaint, and I know their motives since we saw it in paper mills versus hemp 100 years ago.

We have safely used hydrocarbon extractions since the 70s in most canola and corn oils. Butane is in the air we breathe. So many products in our daily life include butane or hydrocarbons; consider that TBHQ (tert-Butylhydroquinone) is in mayonnaise, peanut butter, corn oil, canola…it’s everywhere.

For my money, hydrocarbon extractions are better. It’s the political battle that is the real concern.

Footnote: “Almost all corn oil is expeller pressed, then solvent extracted using hexane or 2-methylpentane (isohexane). The solvent is evaporated from the corn oil, recovered, and re-used. After extraction, the corn oil is then refined by degumming and/or alkali treatment, both of which remove phosphatides. Alkali treatment also neutralizes free fatty acids and removes color (bleaching). Final steps in refining include winterization (the removal of waxes), and deodorization by steam distillation of the oil at 232–260 °C (450–500 °F) under a high vacuum.[1]”

Rick Scarpello

Rick Scarpello

Rick Scarpello, Founding Partner and CEO of Medically Correct LLC is a food expert with a strong operations, compliance, and accounting background. He is a self-avowed serial entrepreneur full of game changing ideas.

Born and raised in a small town in Iowa, Scarpello moved to Denver, Colorado to make a name for himself. His innovative thinking and inquisitive mind drove him to develop several businesses the latest of which is Medically Correct, LLC one of the leading companies in the rapidly expanding Cannabis Industry.

Scarpello is also the founding partner of Sproutwell LLC, specializing in gluten-free sprouted grains and Alien Grains LLC, a gluten-free beer company.

Earlier in his career, Scarpello crafted the recipe for Flouish Gluten-Free Bread later partnering with Udi’s, the number one gluten-free product in it’s category. Rick’s leadership moved Udi’s and earlier Il Fornaio Bakeries into the frozen par-baked bread category, increasing the opportunity for expansion.

Rick and his wife of the last 19 years spend their free time watching their teenage daughter’s volleyball games and their 12-year old son excel at baseball.

Rick can be reached at [email protected].

This Post Has 18 Comments
  1. This article is a a slanted op-ed piece and should have been identified as such. Or is it a press release from Incredible Extractor? Rick is really reaching with his cons for CO2. Smoking solvent CO2 causes pneumonia? Reference? Some states require (or will require) residual solvent testing in concentrates and CO2 is not listed for any of them. All hydrocarbons have a limit and will fail your sample at the lab if they remain. Until states require residual solvent testing, anyone who smokes concentrates by hydrocarbon is taking their chances. Just say what you’re thinking: BHO is less expensive than CO2. That is about to change. CBE did a disservice by misrepresenting this article as fact.

    1. What was written was possibly, or conjecture, is what that says about pneumonia. That comment came from an internal science major I spoke to. Where’s the years of proof smoking co2? There isn’t. So it’s all conjecture at this point.

      The FDA says 5,000ppm for butane in food. Nobody is that high on residual residue. Colorado says 800ppm and I’ve never been close.

      Not a disservice. I’m a food extraction expert with 20+ years of extraction experience. Are you?

      Facts are what we search for please.

      1. I will also add; I started using co2 a few years back, the two largest name extractors. They were not as good. We sent one back. The other we sold it. Hydrocarbons work better! I’ve personally owned both and made s decision. Only then did I build a better mousetrap. That’s when I invented the incredible extractor. After see what’s best with my hands and eyes and pocketbook. It’s safe (read article) it’s better (read article) the FDA and my experts say the residual can be nominal and safe. I don’t understand..Why is that a bad thing?

        1. Co2 is defintly a safer extraction method. That is 100% fact. There is absolutely no potential to blow the roof off the building using a Supercritical CO2 extractor. I do agree butane creates a higher quality produ ct, but does the end justify the means.

          1. Completely wrong sir. There is much HIGHER pressures and more of a danger with co2 explosions. I’ve done both, I am an expert at this. I’m sorry but your statement is completely, unequivocally incorrect.

          2. He said 100% safer way, just not true… co2 is higher pressures by far, up to 100psi for butane, up to 10,000psi supercritical co2.

            Remember we are talking machines that get so big they don’t fit in your front room, and the bolts that hold them together are as wide as your wrist. I’ve seen these machines in the ingredient industry and yes they can blow everything up, your whole house.

            I am not talking about where the pot industry is today but where we are heading. We will definitely be talking about HUGE machines soon as this industry grows. It will come from plants that already make them. Not these companies presently, unless they keep up with growth but then they compete with a whole different level of manufacturing.

            This is not new, but very old technology… co2 machines were used in dry cleaning in the past, huge machines. co2 is used still today for that and for ingredients for food.

            There’s a reason we use co2 and use hydrocarbons today in food, they work. Please everyone stop thinking we are just now inventing this, it already existed before you were born.

      2. Rick, I LOVED your article. As always you come correct. I wanted to just point out one thing that I felt you should exclude from your findings(my opinion)

        Butane is a substance we as humans deal with on the daily, this is true. BUT is it relevant? Just because we already un-knowingly ingest it, does not mean(imho) that ingesting more should be of no concern. I felt that your findings and argument is well within strength without needing to further it with that particular fact.

        I too have 20+ years experience and I think you said it best when you referred to the whole process as a delicate balance between fact and religion. Without the religious side of it all I think the “art form” one acquires through countless process’ is either lost or non-existent.

        I have tasted MANY BHO processed waxes. I can say WITHOUT a doubt that the process can be mastered and even the most competent of connoisseur could become baffled with any kind of taste test.

        Myself I use Hex. Have since beginning. For me I have developed that “art form” I mentioned above. I get BEST results in potency AND return. For me, only thing that comes close is 99% Iso (alcohol). I was apprehensive about implementing a BHO extraction, but after reading your post I am forever changed and am now going to add BHO to my list of process’.

        Looking forward to your next article.

      3. Logan,

        Are you saying Freon is also good for extracting or are you speaking of that R-402, R22 stuff that is also Freon, I know, but its refined to be more environmentally friendly?

        Father was also a refrigeration mechanic I grew up going on ride-alongs to many a safeway! I got to learn about all the fuels used to keep all the yummy food I love cold/fresh.

        he taught me ALL about air flow and temperature manipulation that i use everyday in my lab.(my fancy word for grow room =p) Also designed my very first set up! Cool trade!

  2. Everyone in the C02 community seems to forget that their Super Critical and some of their Sub Critical Extractions will still have to be refined with SOLVENTS, like ISO, Hexane or Ethanol, for winterizing. You can can scream and yell all you want about being totally solvent-less, but we know!

    So get off your high horse about your solvent-less extraction process, We have all seen the beautiful yellow/golden goo that comes out of the C02 machines… which those of us in the industry know will have to be cleaned up using different types of solvents before it will be ready for consumption… Sadly it is the Fats, Waxes, Lipids, chlorophyll, and lots of other undesirables that get extracted during the Super critical process, less of that comes out in a sub-critical run but, never-the-less, you will still get higher quality products from the initial extraction using Butane than you ever will using CO2.

    Both extraction methods are capable of producing excellent products, the biggest difference to me is: mainly the cost, for around $3-5k you can get started with butane, propane or a combination of the two, on the other hand several of the CO2 machines we have looked at have been well over $200k More than a house costs in some cases… So other than price here are a few other differences you might not be aware of… CO2 machines can weigh more than a thousand pounds… are bulky, LOUD, and require a large air compressor to help recover the gas…

    So in my opinion, if you don’t have someone with millions of dollars behind you, the cost of C02 machine alone will prohibit most would be extractors from getting started, not to mention the space required to fit the machines and all the accessories that make it work, AND many of these machines require 3 Phase power, which is not available everywhere, and may cost you thousands of dollars just to have the power company come put it in …

    And on top of all that you still have to put together the rest of the Lab, your gonna need #1 a Vacuum oven, #2 distillation setup, #3 all necessary glassware, heating mantles, stands, jacks, etc…. All of that can cost you a few thousand more on top of the CO2 machine itself…

    Is butane dangerous, YES, is C02 dangerous, YES, we all know why butane is, so let me tell you why C02 is as well. Can you imagine a part failure at over 1000psi even a simple hose blowing off and whipping around the room could be enough to seriously injure or even kill someone… a leaky C02 tank will not create an explosion hazard but will displace the oxygen in the area making a hazardous breathing environment for everyone nearby, odorless and colorless you may not even know you had a leak… there are leak detectors for both C02 and Butane, and they should be used no matter which way you decide to go…

    In conclusion, if you are a diehard solvent-less guy with millions of dollars at your disposal than by all means get your C02 on !!!

    For the rest of us getting by paycheck to paycheck, we like our “Tane” Quick, Easy, low start up costs, easy to purge, great tasting, high quality, short recovery times even in a passive system, and as long as you are using a “well made Closed Loop system” and you are using it ” CORRECTLY” they do have a high margin of safety !!!

  3. I would like to start by stating that I’m a veteran refrigeration technician with almost 20 years experience working with solvents including refrigerant, hydrocarbons, ammonia and carbon dioxide.

    Hydrocarbons are only dangerous (and potentially explosive) when handled incorrectly, if SOPs are not followed or you just do something stupid. Hydrocarbons are used as safe refrigerant all the time with no fires or explosions.

    Carbon dioxide if used incorrectly, if SOPs are not followed or you just do something stupid have the potential to cause a MUCH greater bodily harm and destruction of property. First carbon dioxide is a serious asphyxiation hazard and has inadvertently hospitalized and killed thousands annually (Google it). And the more concerning issue is that if a super critical or sub critical fluid extractor is used incorrectly, SOPs are not followed or you just do something stupid there is a serious explosion hazard that can dismember and kill you. These machines operate at extremely high pressures (between 800psi to over 5000psi) at that pressure even a small leak that releases nothing but carbon dioxide could sever flesh and cause dismemberment. No other solvent operates at these pressures and in my industry there is a lot of hesitation to adopt carbon dioxide as a standard solely because of this fact.

    Now all that being said I enjoy many different types of concentrates including CO2, BHO, PHO, RSO and a few made from solvents long since abandoned due to manufacturing dangers. My personal favorite is made with a refrigerant blend commonly used in transport refrigeration ( I.e. semi truck trailers).

    Also I would like to add a question to all those long time smokers of cannabis. With all the concern over residual butane (let’s say 300ppm) that is flash vaporized during dabbing, has any one considered how much butane is inhaled during the use of a BIC lighter during smoking flower? Just saying…

  4. “Patients are potentially smoking water into their lungs which could result in pneumonia” Really? So breathing a little steam vapor causes pneumonia. Funny. There’s no scientific literature I can find that even hints at this absurd statement. Oh, and I love the line about how our food supply is polluted with solvent residues already so that justifies using butane as an extraction solvent. Pathetic article.

  5. Great article! So many have been stuck trying to meet the ROI many CO2 extractor companies represent. I would add that while hydrocarbons are most used solvent type, many of them used in food oil processes are very hard to remove completely. FDA allows hexane(s) residuals (YUK!). The beauty of butane is it is very easy to compress and remove completely from an extraction, with a fraction of the energy inputs for evaporating solvents like hexane. Most all of the traditional hydrocarbon methods subject the product to heat during removal of solvent. The cannabis community has embraced the fact that butane can be used as a solvent below the temp which water freezes. I can see Butane extractions replacing many CO2 processes. The newest systems for BHO take advantage of Butane’s wide temp range as it is compressed and expanded, lending even more safety and efficiency to the process. CO2 (especially supercritical) will not scale as efficiently as Butane. mark my words ~ Dr.Terp

  6. Hello,

    I’m new here,and wondering if someone from here is familiar with granddaddy og marijuana seeds..??

  7. Any chance someone’s taken a stab at cost/benefit analysis for these extraction methods? Which yields the highest ROI?
    Also, doesn’t rosin press constitute an extraction method? Does it warrant a mention?

  8. Does the extraction process damage the building and the equipment in the kitchen and dish washing rooms (example: if it was a restaurant)? If I have questions, can someone please call me. I will message a number when contacted.

  9. There is another way to extract using water that people aren’t talking about cause it’s cheap and equipment manufactures can’t make money from it. It uses nothing more than commercially available food processing equipment.
    Stop getting fleeced by unqualified medicinal chemists with no real world experience in process development or manufacturing.
    Those that don’t discover the cheapest way of doing things will get left behind……
    [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Stories

Pot Industry High on Florida’s Marijuana Legalization Referendum

Voters will now get to decide whether to legalize recreational marijuana in a state that has a well-established medical pot marketplace. When the Florida Supreme Court earlier this month approved a November referendum on…

US Marijuana Industry Hits All-Time High

The legal cannabis industry is thriving in the U.S., reaching its highest-ever number of jobs and sales, a new report shows. Vangst, a cannabis industry job platform, found that at…

Black market marijuana tied to Chinese criminal networks infiltrates Maine

Maine is the newest frontier for the illicit marijuana trade, with potentially hundreds of suspected unlicensed grow houses operating in the state, a CBS News investigation has found. It’s part…

Iowa’s medical marijuana program is 10 years old. How does it compare with other states?

Ten years ago this month, Iowa policymakers made it legal to use cannabis for certain medical treatment, marking the start of what would eventually become Iowa’s existing medical cannabidiol program.…

More Categories

Back To Top
×Close search
Search